Protyus A. Gendher
-
Disposable

The poem “Disposable” by Protyus A. Gendher reflects the pain of feeling welcomed only to be reminded of one’s outsider status. The author expresses the hurt of false kindness from those who, once boundaries are drawn, reveal that their affection is conditional, leaving the speaker feeling alone and undervalued. Continue reading
cult of the ego, cycle breaking, Erasing The Silence, grooming, human trafficking, Let Them – Review, Revictimization, Uncategorizedadvice, art, communication, community, content warning, disposable, family, Free, gullible, health, help, human, journal, kindness, life, love, me too, no paywalls, outcast, outreach, pariah, people, personal truth, perspective, Poetry, resources, self help, self improvement, struggle, survivor, therapy, trigger warning -
24) It’s Ok

The content explores the complexities of grief through a reflective lens. It emphasizes that it’s acceptable to experience various emotions during mourning, highlighting the notion that one can feel both okay and not okay simultaneously. The author encourages self-acceptance and underscores the importance of personal healing journeys. Continue reading
advice, anthropology, authenticity, autoethnography, communication, community, connection, content warning, family, Free, grief, grieving, healing, health, help, its ok, journal, life, losing people, loss, loved ones, me too, Mental Health, moving on, no paywalls, outreach, personal truth, perspective, poem, Poetry, psychology, recovery, resources, script, script theory, self help, self improvement, struggle, suicide, survivor, therapy, trauma, trigger warning
Recent Posts
- Relational Field Theory -How Survivor Literacy Transforms the Future: From Rupture to Regeneration
Relational Field Theory How Survivor Literacy Transforms the Future: From Rupture to Regeneration Communities often imagine healing as a return… Read more: Relational Field Theory -How Survivor Literacy Transforms the Future: From Rupture to Regeneration - Relational Field Theory – The Trauma of Treating Communal Wounds as Personal Ones
The text discusses the detrimental effects of misattributing communal wounds as personal failures, leading to a secondary trauma. It emphasizes that this misinterpretation distorts individual identity and creates chronic shame. Healing requires communities to acknowledge collective wounds and facilitate survivor-oriented narratives, fostering recognition, accountability, and communal repair for genuine recovery. - Relational Field Theory -The Survivor‑Literate Community: A Vision for What Comes After Repair
Survivor-literate communities view healing as the start of a transformative journey rather than an endpoint. They prioritize truth, support survivors as cultural guides, and embrace accountability as a shared practice. These communities cultivate resilience, vulnerability, and collective healing, creating environments for deeper relationships and regeneration from past wounds. - Relational Field Theory – What Communities Must Learn to Become Survivor‑Literate
Communities must cultivate survivor literacy to effectively interpret and respond to harm. This entails recognizing that survivors signal impact, understanding that harm is relational, embracing transparency over silence, and promoting accountability as repair. Survivor literacy is a collective responsibility, pivotal for community resilience, safety, and sustainable growth. - Relational Field Theory -Why Survivor Literacy Matters for Healing Communal Wounds
Survivor literacy is crucial for addressing communal wounds, distinguishing between individual and collective trauma. It helps identify hidden systemic failures, reframes narratives away from personal flaws, and fosters communal healing through shared understanding and responsibility. By transforming suffering into knowledge, survivor literacy empowers communities to heal and prevent repeating past harm. - Relational Field Theory – How to Recognize When a Wound Belongs to the Field, Not the Self
Relational Field Theory emphasizes distinguishing personal wounds from collective ones. Symptoms include disproportionate emotional responses, ancient feelings of shame, narrative collapse, intense bodily reactions, misplaced guilt, and lack of healing through personal efforts. Recognizing the wound’s true scale allows individuals to disengage from unresolvable battles and find clarity and healing. - Relational Field Theory – Returning the Wound to the Field
The content discusses Relational Field Theory, emphasizing that personal wounds may stem from collective experiences rather than individual failings. Healing involves recognizing and returning the wound to the communal field, understanding its structural origins, and reshaping one’s narrative. This process fosters recovery, allowing individuals to reclaim their true selves and shift their perspective on pain and identity. - Relational Field Theory -Personal Failure as Field Indicator
Relational Field Theory posits that feelings of personal failure may not indicate individual inadequacy but suggest a collective wound. Sensitive individuals often detect systemic ruptures and misattribution of blame. Healing occurs when one recognizes these wounds are broader than personal experiences, allowing for clarity and a balanced perspective on the situation. - Relational Field Theory – The Collective Wound Cannot Be Resolved by an Individual
The text discusses the concept of collective wounds that cannot be resolved individually. It highlights how societal, cultural, and structural issues affect sensitive individuals who mistakenly internalize the blame for larger problems. True healing requires recognition and communal support rather than personal efforts, as collective wounds need to be acknowledged and shared to heal effectively. - Relational Field Theory – The Greatest Gift He Never Gave Me
The author reflects on the profound impact of Charlie Love, an influential figure in their life, who represented permanence and connection. Although he never gifted a promised pineapple plant, this unfulfilled promise became an enduring symbol of their relationship. The real gift was the shared experiences and stories that continued to resonate after his passing. - Relational Field Theory -Hau as Plurallility Activation
Hau is an influential force beyond the spirit of the gift, activating relational fields that expand identities and connections. The strongest hau arises from unfulfilled gifts, which create lasting connections and open portals to deeper relational contexts. This exploration reveals how hau binds individuals to people and places not yet experienced, enhancing communal identity. - Relational Field Theory – Plurallile Profile: Charlie Love (WWCC Rapa Nui)
Charlie Love is a cultural conduit embodying ancestral knowledge and continuity through practice and storytelling. His relational approach fosters communal learning and participation, allowing cultural knowledge to flourish without hierarchy. While his deep-rootedness can lead to inflexibility, his role stabilizes tradition and keeps connections to land and lineage alive. - Relational Field Theory – Shadow Form as System Diagnostic
The shadow form in relational field theory highlights distortions in systems affecting individuals. It signifies the pressure points showing where a system over-extracts, revealing structural failures. Sensitive individuals often exhibit shadows first, indicating environmental dysfunctions. When systems stabilize, shadows dissolve, reflecting the dynamic nature of relationships rather than personal deficiencies. - Relational Field Theory – Plurallile Profile: Protyus A. Gendher
Protyus A. Gendher embodies Relational Field Theory as a phase-shifter, altering environments and facilitating connections across diverse languages and disciplines. Their generative presence cultivates communal agency by transforming individual experiences into collective structures, though they risk self-erasure under pressure. Protyus ultimately reveals hidden patterns, fostering emergent possibilities. - Relational Field Theory –
Allison Quaggin exemplifies a precise and analytical presence in her field, characterized by methodological acuity and intellectual clarity. She organizes complexity by emphasizing structure and evidence, fostering reliable and thoughtful interactions. However, her intensity may come across as cold, potentially limiting emotional nuance and relational warmth.
Newsletter
Make a one-time donation
Make a monthly donation
Choose an amount
Or enter a custom amount
Your contribution is appreciated.
Your contribution is appreciated.
DonateDonate monthly











