WAR ON STUDENT SUCCESS SERVICES – How Upward Bound, McNair, and DEI Became Targets — And Why Students Pay the Price

Stone pathway floating in the sky leading to a black graduation cap with a gold tassel

What These Programs Actually Do

Upward Bound, McNair, TRIO, and DEI initiatives are not “extras.”
They are structural supports designed to counteract structural barriers.

They provide:

  • academic tutoring
  • research opportunities
  • mentorship
  • graduate school preparation
  • financial guidance
  • community belonging
  • cultural competency
  • disability and identity support
  • first‑gen navigation tools

These programs increase retention, graduation, and upward mobility — especially for students who were never meant to survive the system without help.

Which is exactly why they’re under attack.

Why Power Targets These Programs

Student success programs threaten the status quo because they:

  • increase social mobility
  • empower marginalized students
  • teach students how systems work
  • reduce dropout rates
  • create informed, confident graduates
  • build community solidarity
  • expose institutional failures
  • challenge inequity

Power prefers students who struggle alone — not students who organize, succeed, and demand better.

The Defunding of Upward Bound

Upward Bound serves:

  • low-income students
  • first-generation students
  • rural students
  • students of color

It provides tutoring, advising, college prep, and stability.

But it is routinely:

  • underfunded
  • cut during budget cycles
  • dismissed as “nonessential”
  • forced to compete for grants
  • limited by political hostility toward anti-poverty programs

The students who need the most support get the least.

The Attack on McNair Scholars

McNair is one of the only programs that:

  • prepares first-gen and minority students for PhDs
  • provides paid research opportunities
  • offers mentorship from faculty
  • teaches graduate school navigation
  • builds academic identity and confidence

But McNair is constantly:

  • threatened by budget cuts
  • forced to justify its existence
  • targeted by anti-DEI legislation
  • limited by grant instability

The pipeline to academia is being narrowed — intentionally.

The DEI Backlash

DEI programs provide:

  • cultural competency
  • anti-discrimination training
  • identity-based support
  • safe spaces
  • staff who understand marginalized experiences
  • conflict resolution
  • bias reporting systems

But DEI has become a political target.
The backlash includes:

  • bans on DEI offices
  • elimination of DEI staff
  • removal of identity centers
  • restrictions on curriculum
  • gag orders on discussing race, gender, or sexuality
  • punishment for faculty who support DEI

The goal is simple:
Make campuses less safe, less inclusive, and less supportive — especially for marginalized students.

Who Gets Hurt

The war on student success services disproportionately harms:

  • poor students
  • first-generation students
  • rural students
  • disabled students
  • LGBTQ+ students
  • students of color
  • student parents
  • survivors of trauma
  • international students

The students who rely on these programs lose the only institutional support they had.

Why Institutions Allow It

Because eliminating these programs:

  • saves money
  • reduces accountability
  • avoids political conflict
  • preserves hierarchical power
  • keeps marginalized students isolated
  • prevents organizing
  • maintains the status quo

Institutions benefit when students struggle quietly.

The Structural Consequences

Defunding Upward Bound, McNair, and DEI leads to:

  • lower retention
  • lower graduation rates
  • higher dropout rates
  • increased food insecurity
  • increased homelessness
  • increased mental health crises
  • decreased representation in graduate programs
  • decreased representation in academia
  • weakened social mobility

These programs aren’t symbolic.
They are lifelines.

The Result

The war on student success services:

  • removes support
  • increases inequality
  • punishes marginalized students
  • reinforces systemic barriers
  • protects institutional power
  • undermines academic achievement
  • erases pathways to graduate school
  • destabilizes entire communities

Upward Bound, McNair, and DEI don’t threaten education.
They threaten inequity — which is why inequity fights back.

Cutting these programs isn’t about efficiency.
It’s about control.

We Believe You


Visit the Series Archive for more.


Apple Music

YouTube Music

Amazon Music

Spotify Music


Discover more from Survivor Literacy

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.



Leave a Reply

Discover more from Survivor Literacy

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading