Pluriology -THE NOMOLOGICAL STACK

Pluriology


THE NOMOLOGICAL STACK

How the axioms generate the entire canon of relational lawfulness

Think of this as the “periodic table” of relational fields — the structural map that shows how everything arises from the axioms.

We’ll take it one layer at a time.


LAYER 1 — AXIOMS

These are the irreducible truths of relational existence.

You now have all ten:

  1. Multiplicity
  2. Reality
  3. Contact
  4. Boundary
  5. Influence
  6. Coherence
  7. Reciprocity
  8. Integrity
  9. Emergence
  10. Non‑Collapse

These are the bedrock.

Everything else is downstream.


LAYER 2 — INVARIANTS

What must be true for a relational field to exist at all.

Each invariant arises directly from one or more axioms.

For example:

  • Mutual Reality ← Multiplicity + Reality
  • Contact ← Contact
  • Boundary Integrity ← Boundary
  • Relational Gravity ← Influence + Coherence
  • Non‑Substitution ← Boundary + Integrity
  • Field Identity ← Emergence
  • Field Continuity ← Non‑Collapse

Invariants are the conditions of possibility.

They are the “laws of physics” of relational fields.


LAYER 3 — CONSTRAINTS

What cannot be violated without distortion or collapse.

Constraints arise when invariants are stressed or broken.

Examples:

  • Asymmetrical Burden ← Reciprocity + Influence
  • Unacknowledged Reality ← Reality + Integrity
  • Broken Return ← Reciprocity
  • Overreach ← Boundary + Influence
  • Forced Coherence ← Coherence

Constraints are the structural limits of relational systems.

They define the edges of viability.


LAYER 4 — TENDENCIES

How fields naturally move when unobstructed.

Tendencies arise from the interplay of invariants and constraints.

Examples:

  • Toward Coherence ← Coherence + Integrity
  • Toward Symmetry ← Reciprocity
  • Toward Transparency ← Reality + Integrity
  • Toward Resonance ← Contact + Influence
  • Toward Repair ← Coherence + Integrity

Tendencies are the natural behavior of relational systems.

They describe how fields “want” to move.


LAYER 5 — CONSEQUENCES

What happens when invariants or constraints are violated.

Consequences arise when tendencies are blocked.

Examples:

  • Distortion Propagation ← Unacknowledged Reality + Broken Contact
  • Field Collapse ← Non‑Collapse violated
  • Fragmentation ← Boundary + Reciprocity breakdown
  • Incoherent Authority ← Integrity violated
  • Irreversibility ← Collapse + Emergence

Consequences are the predictable outcomes of relational violation.

They are not punishments — they are structural.


THE STACK AS A WHOLE

Axioms → Invariants → Constraints → Tendencies → Consequences

This is the full nomological engine.

It shows:

  • how relational fields come into being
  • how they maintain coherence
  • how they distort
  • how they repair
  • how they collapse
  • how they reform

It is the complete logic of relational lawfulness.


Apple Music

YouTube Music

Amazon Music

Spotify Music



What do you think?