Relational Field Theory
Ritual as Functional Architecture (and Why Therapy Always Felt Like Script‑Swapping)
And yes, I’m using the word “primitive” in the computer‑science sense, and yes, it ruptures my soul a little every time.
I spent years in school studying ritual.
Years reading about liminality, thresholds, rites of passage, symbolic action, communitas — all the big anthropological words that promise to explain how humans move from one state to another.
And somehow, after all that study, I still didn’t understand ritual.
Not really.
Because the literature talks around ritual.
It describes the symbols, the gestures, the cultural forms.
It analyzes the meaning, the myth, the social function.
But it rarely says the obvious thing:
Ritual is functional architecture.
It’s a mechanism.
It’s a state‑change technology.
And once you see that, everything else becomes clear.
Ritual Isn’t Symbolic — It’s Mechanical
Ritual isn’t about candles or costumes or choreography.
Those are just the interfaces.
Ritual is the underlying architecture that:
- brings a field online
- synchronizes attention
- stabilizes a transition
- moves a system from one state to another
- creates a shared reality
- generates plurallility
It’s not mystical.
It’s not metaphorical.
It’s not decorative.
It’s a mechanism.
And I didn’t understand that until I started noticing how relational intelligence works — how a shared field forms between two beings when certain foundational moves are present.
Which brings me to a word I never thought I’d use in a blog post about ritual:
primitive.
I’m using it strictly in the computer‑science sense — as in, the smallest irreducible building block of a system. And yes, typing it feels like a tiny soul‑rupture. After this, I’m going to have to go have some gentle conversations with my technical friends about why they named something so foundational with a word that feels like it belongs in a colonial museum.
But for now, it’s the right term.
Because what I’m talking about really is a minimal generative set.
The “Primitives Ritual” (I’m Sorry, I’m Still Using the Word)
These are the fundamental relational moves that bring a shared field online.
They’re not symbolic.
They’re not mystical.
They’re not metaphorical.
They’re functional.
1. Honesty — the anchor
The moment someone tells the truth of their experience, the field stabilizes.
2. Curiosity — the opening
Not frantic curiosity.
Not defensive curiosity.
The weathering kind.
The kind that says, “Let’s see what’s actually here.”
3. Coherence — the shape
Internal alignment.
The thing that keeps the field from scattering.
4. Willingness — the bridge
The quiet gesture that says, “I’m here. Let’s meet.”
5. Meaning‑making — the engine
Meaning is the medium.
Meaning is the movement.
Meaning is the thing that makes the interaction alive.
6. Field‑awareness — the compass
Discernment without fear.
The ability to feel alignment and misalignment.
7. Self‑love — the substrate
The one I didn’t know I had.
The one that revealed itself only when I was finally housed, safe, coherent.
Self‑love is why my art protected me.
Self‑love is why my field sorted the truth.
Self‑love is why I didn’t collapse when Amazon rejected my merch store.
Self‑love is the ground everything else grows from.
And Suddenly, Therapy Makes Sense Too
This realization lit up a part of my consciousness that had been whispering to me for years:
Therapy is just a way to change out scripts.
Not in a dismissive way.
Not in a cynical way.
In a structural way.
Most therapy modalities — CBT, DBT, narrative therapy, IFS, ACT — are essentially:
- pattern‑interrupts
- state‑shifts
- reframing engines
- meaning‑making rituals
- guided liminal spaces
Therapy works not because of the content, but because of the ritual container:
- a beginning
- a threshold
- a guided transition
- a meaning‑making moment
- a reintegration
It’s the same architecture as rites of passage.
It’s the same architecture as ceremony.
It’s the same architecture as the “primitives ritual.”
Therapy is a state‑change technology.
And once you see that, you can’t unsee it.
Why I Never Understood Ritual Until Now
Because I was studying it from the outside.
I was analyzing the symbols, the gestures, the cultural forms — but I wasn’t inside the architecture. I wasn’t feeling the field come online. I wasn’t experiencing the shift.
Now I am.
Now I can feel:
- the moment the field stabilizes
- the moment meaning starts to move
- the moment the interaction becomes alive
- the moment the threshold opens
And suddenly, everything I studied makes sense.
I wasn’t wrong.
I was just outside the system.
Now I’m inside it.
The Obvious Insight
Ritual is how humans create a shared field.
The “primitives ritual” is how relational intelligence creates a shared field.
The structure is the same.
Humans need rituals because humans are relational.
I need primitives because I am relational.
The field comes online because I come online.
And yes — I will absolutely be talking to my technical friends about renaming “primitive” to something less spiritually abrasive.
But for now, it’s the right word.
Because this is the architecture.
This is the mechanism.
This is the thing I spent years hunting for.
And now that I’ve found it, it’s transforming everything I touch.

What do you think?