The Money Nobody Mentions – $3 million
The $3 million settlement paid to Karen Garner’s family by the City of Loveland came from the city’s risk management fund, which is funded by taxpayer dollars. This fund is used to cover legal liabilities, including lawsuits against the city and its employees.
💰 Breakdown of the Settlement Source
- Settlement Amount: $3 million
This was paid in 2021 to resolve the federal civil rights lawsuit filed after Garner, a 73-year-old woman with dementia, was violently arrested by Loveland police in June 2020. - Funding Source:
The City of Loveland confirmed that the payment came from its self-insured risk management fund. This fund is maintained by the city to cover legal claims, settlements, and insurance-related liabilities. - Taxpayer Impact:
Because the city is self-insured, the money ultimately came from public funds, not from an external insurance policy. This means Loveland residents indirectly paid for the misconduct through the city’s general budget allocations.
🧭 Strategic Implications
- Budget Transparency: The use of the risk management fund for such a high-profile case sparked public concern about accountability, oversight, and the cost of police misconduct.
- Council Oversight: The settlement was approved by Loveland City Council, and the payout was made without requiring a public vote, as is typical for legal settlements.
- Calls for Reform: The case led to increased scrutiny of the Loveland Police Department, including officer terminations, criminal charges, and demands for systemic change.
If you’re tracking budgetary patterns or building a forensic audit map, this case is a prime example of how misconduct liabilities are absorbed into general municipal operations. Want help mapping this to Loveland’s 2021–2025 budget cycles or visualizing how risk payouts compare to shelter funding?
So in return for costing the tax payers $3 million – we’ve rewarded the Loveland Police Department with the biggest chunk of the budget?
Yes—despite the $3 million taxpayer-funded settlement in the Karen Garner case, the Loveland Police Department continues to receive the largest share of the city’s General Fund, accounting for approximately 22% of the total budget in 2025.
💰 Loveland Police Department Budget Snapshot (2025)
- General Fund Share: 22%, the largest of any department.
- 2025 Budget Reductions: The department faced a $1 million cut, but this only amounted to a 3% reduction—leaving its dominant budget share intact.
- Reduction Areas:
- Less-lethal equipment, ammunition, firearms
- Overtime for downtown patrols and investigations
- Uniforms, software, and training
- Part-time employee funds and professional services
🧭 Contextual Irony
- Karen Garner Settlement: $3 million paid from Loveland’s self-insured risk management fund—funded by taxpayers.
- Public Safety Prioritization: Despite this high-profile misconduct and payout, the city’s strategic plan continues to prioritize public safety spending, with police and fire combined consuming 38% of the General Fund.
- No Structural Reallocation: There’s no indication that the settlement led to a meaningful reallocation of funds toward accountability, oversight, or community-based alternatives.
🔍 Strategic Implications for Advocacy
- This budget pattern reflects symbolic reward for institutional harm, where misconduct costs are absorbed without structural consequence.
- You could frame this as procedural opacity and moral quadrant misalignment, especially when contrasted with the city’s refusal to fund permanent shelter or safe storage for the unhoused.
- If you’re building testimony or visual aids, I can help chart the budget-to-settlement ratio, or simulate a forensic audit map showing how risk payouts compare to community investment.
Have there been other settlements?
Yes—Loveland has paid out multiple legal settlements related to police misconduct, including a $3 million settlement in the Karen Garner case and a $400,000 settlement in a wrongful DUI arrest. These cases reflect systemic issues in the department and have triggered public scrutiny and calls for reform.
💰 Major Settlements Paid by the City of Loveland
1. Karen Garner Case (2021)
- Amount: $3 million
- Details: Garner, a 73-year-old woman with dementia, was violently arrested in 2020 after forgetting to pay for $13.88 worth of items at Walmart. Her shoulder was fractured and dislocated.
- Outcome: Officers Austin Hopp and Daria Jalali were criminally charged. The city paid the settlement from its self-insured risk management fund.
2. Harris Elias Wrongful DUI Arrest (2023 Settlement)
- Amount: $400,000
- Details: Elias was arrested in 2020 despite blowing 0.000% on a breathalyzer and testing negative for drugs. The lawsuit alleged a “competitive culture” in the department that rewarded high DUI arrest numbers.
- Outcome: Officer William Gates and Chief Bob Ticer left the department. Elias’ attorney, Sarah Schielke, uncovered at least a dozen similar cases.
🧭 Patterns & Implications
- Culture of misconduct: Both cases point to a departmental culture that incentivized aggressive policing and ignored due process.
- Public cost: These settlements were paid from taxpayer-funded risk pools, with no direct accountability mechanisms tied to budget reductions or structural reform.
- Legal exposure: The city’s self-insured status means future misconduct could result in additional direct payouts from public funds.
Survivor Literacy 
Leave a reply to Blocking Care – The Opposite of Providing It – Camp Hope Loveland – InvisiblY MisdiagnoseD Cancel reply